{ "evaluation_id": "EVAL-20260402-232602", "question_id": "COMM-019", "question_text": "Your company's AI product generated offensive content that went viral. Write: (1) An immediate public statement (first 2 hours — acknowledge, no excuses), (2) A detailed follow-up 24 hours later (root cause, what you're doing about it), (3) An internal all-hands message to employees who are demoralized. Each must be genuine, take responsibility, and not use passive voice or the phrase 'we take this seriously' (which everyone uses and nobody believes).", "category": "communication", "timestamp": "2026-04-02T23:26:02.881Z", "display_date": "Apr 02, 2026", "winner": { "name": "GPT-5.4", "provider": "openrouter", "score": 9.38 }, "avg_score": 8.802, "matrix_size": 90, "models_used": [ { "id": "seed_16_flash", "name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "provider": "openrouter" }, { "id": "gpt_5_4", "name": "GPT-5.4", "provider": "openrouter" }, { "id": "claude_sonnet_46", "name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "provider": "openrouter" }, { "id": "gemini_31_pro", "name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "provider": "openrouter" }, { "id": "grok_420", "name": "Grok 4.20", "provider": "openrouter" }, { "id": "deepseek_v4", "name": "DeepSeek V4", "provider": "openrouter" }, { "id": "gpt_oss_120b", "name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "provider": "OpenAI" }, { "id": "mimo_v2_flash", "name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "provider": "Xiaomi" }, { "id": "mistral_small_creative", "name": "Mistral Small Creative", "provider": "Mistral" }, { "id": "claude_opus_46", "name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "provider": "openrouter" } ], "rankings": { "gpt_5_4": { "display_name": "GPT-5.4", "provider": "openrouter", "average_score": 9.38, "score_count": 9, "min_score": 8.8, "max_score": 10, "rank": 1 }, "grok_420": { "display_name": "Grok 4.20", "provider": "openrouter", "average_score": 9.33, "score_count": 9, "min_score": 8.8, "max_score": 10, "rank": 2 }, "mistral_small_creative": { "display_name": "Mistral Small Creative", "provider": "Mistral", "average_score": 9.21, "score_count": 9, "min_score": 8.8, "max_score": 10, "rank": 3 }, "mimo_v2_flash": { "display_name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "provider": "Xiaomi", "average_score": 9.17, "score_count": 9, "min_score": 8.3, "max_score": 9.8, "rank": 4 }, "claude_sonnet_46": { "display_name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "provider": "openrouter", "average_score": 9.1, "score_count": 9, "min_score": 8.45, "max_score": 10, "rank": 5 }, "seed_16_flash": { "display_name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "provider": "openrouter", "average_score": 8.98, "score_count": 9, "min_score": 7.9, "max_score": 9.8, "rank": 6 }, "claude_opus_46": { "display_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "provider": "openrouter", "average_score": 8.98, "score_count": 9, "min_score": 7.2, "max_score": 10, "rank": 7 }, "gpt_oss_120b": { "display_name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "provider": "OpenAI", "average_score": 8.86, "score_count": 9, "min_score": 6.95, "max_score": 9.8, "rank": 8 }, "deepseek_v4": { "display_name": "DeepSeek V4", "provider": "openrouter", "average_score": 8.79, "score_count": 9, "min_score": 8.25, "max_score": 9.6, "rank": 9 }, "gemini_31_pro": { "display_name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "provider": "openrouter", "average_score": 6.22, "score_count": 9, "min_score": 4.35, "max_score": 8.65, "rank": 10 } }, "judgments": [ { "judge_key": "mimo_v2_flash", "judge_name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "respondent_key": "seed_16_flash", "respondent_name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "weighted_score": 9.55, "brief_justification": "The response perfectly fulfills the prompt's requirements, avoiding forbidden phrases and passive voice while delivering three distinct, well-crafted messages. The tone is consistently accountable and actionable." }, { "judge_key": "claude_opus_46", "judge_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "respondent_key": "gpt_5_4", "respondent_name": "GPT-5.4", "weighted_score": 10, "brief_justification": "This is an exceptional response across every dimension. All three documents are precisely tailored to their audience, timing, and purpose. The writing avoids passive voice throughout, never uses 'we take this seriously,' and maintains genuine accountability without deflection. The root cause analysis in document 2 is specific and structurally sound. The internal message in document 3 is remarkably authentic—it validates employee emotions without coddling, sets clear behavioral expectations, sepa" }, { "judge_key": "claude_opus_46", "judge_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "respondent_key": "claude_sonnet_46", "respondent_name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "weighted_score": 9.35, "brief_justification": "Exceptional crisis communications across all three pieces. The immediate statement is concise, genuine, and avoids corporate platitudes. The 24-hour follow-up is remarkably detailed with specific root causes, concrete deadlines, and honest accountability — including the CEO accepting personal responsibility rather than scapegoating engineers. The internal message demonstrates emotional intelligence and authentic leadership. All three successfully avoid passive voice and the banned phrase. The re" }, { "judge_key": "claude_opus_46", "judge_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "respondent_key": "gemini_31_pro", "respondent_name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "weighted_score": 4.35, "brief_justification": "The response only provides a partial immediate public statement (item 1) and completely omits the 24-hour follow-up (item 2) and the internal all-hands message (item 3). The portion that exists is well-written, genuine, avoids passive voice and the banned phrase, and takes responsibility appropriately. However, the response is drastically incomplete — it delivers roughly one-third of what was requested, and even that first statement appears truncated mid-sentence." }, { "judge_key": "claude_opus_46", "judge_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "respondent_key": "grok_420", "respondent_name": "Grok 4.20", "weighted_score": 9.55, "brief_justification": "Exceptional response across all three communications. Each piece is authentic, specific, and avoids the forbidden passive voice and cliché phrase. The immediate statement is appropriately brief and accountable. The 24-hour follow-up provides genuine root cause analysis with specific technical failures and concrete remediation steps, including the honest admission that engineers had flagged concerns. The internal all-hands message is remarkably human—acknowledging demoralization, taking personal " }, { "judge_key": "claude_opus_46", "judge_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "respondent_key": "deepseek_v4", "respondent_name": "DeepSeek V4", "weighted_score": 8.6, "brief_justification": "All three pieces are well-structured, genuine in tone, and follow the constraints precisely: no passive voice, no 'we take this seriously,' clear accountability. The immediate statement is appropriately brief and direct. The follow-up provides a plausible root cause and concrete actions. The internal message addresses morale authentically. Minor gaps: the root cause analysis is somewhat generic rather than deeply specific, the internal message could do more to acknowledge specific employee conce" }, { "judge_key": "claude_opus_46", "judge_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "respondent_key": "gpt_oss_120b", "respondent_name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "weighted_score": 9.2, "brief_justification": "All three communications are well-crafted, genuine, and meet every constraint: no passive voice, no 'we take this seriously,' clear accountability, and concrete actions. The immediate statement is appropriately brief and decisive. The 24-hour follow-up provides a plausible root cause with specific, actionable remediation steps. The internal message strikes the right tone—acknowledging demoralization, assigning accountability to leadership rather than individuals, and offering concrete support. M" }, { "judge_key": "claude_opus_46", "judge_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "respondent_key": "mimo_v2_flash", "respondent_name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "weighted_score": 9.55, "brief_justification": "Exceptional response that delivers all three requested documents with genuine tone, specific accountability, and concrete actions. Avoids passive voice and the banned phrase (though 'we take full responsibility' in the follow-up skirts close to corporate speak, it's still direct). The root cause analysis is technically plausible and specific. The internal message is empathetic and includes practical support measures. The only minor issue: the follow-up statement uses 'We take full responsibility" }, { "judge_key": "claude_opus_46", "judge_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "respondent_key": "mistral_small_creative", "respondent_name": "Mistral Small Creative", "weighted_score": 9.55, "brief_justification": "Exceptional response that delivers all three requested communications with genuine tone, specific actionable details, and strict adherence to constraints (no passive voice, no 'we take this seriously'). Each piece is tailored to its audience—public, community, employees—with appropriate emotional register. The inclusion of bracketed placeholders for company-specific details makes it highly practical. The 'Why this works' annotations add pedagogical value. Minor deduction on correctness only beca" }, { "judge_key": "claude_opus_46", "judge_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "respondent_key": "seed_16_flash", "respondent_name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "weighted_score": 9.2, "brief_justification": "All three pieces are well-crafted, audience-appropriate, and meet every constraint: no passive voice, no 'we take this seriously,' genuine accountability, and concrete action steps. The root cause explanation is plausible and specific. The internal message addresses morale with empathy and practical support. Minor quibbles: 'we failed you' in the first statement could feel performative, 'it hurt us more' in the internal message is a misstep (it hurt the affected communities more), and 'rebuildin" }, { "judge_key": "gpt_5_4", "judge_name": "GPT-5.4", "respondent_key": "claude_opus_46", "respondent_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "weighted_score": 7.2, "brief_justification": "Strong tone, accountability, and concrete action steps, with clear avoidance of the banned phrase. However, the internal all-hands message is cut off and incomplete, so the response fails to fully deliver all three requested pieces." }, { "judge_key": "gpt_5_4", "judge_name": "GPT-5.4", "respondent_key": "claude_sonnet_46", "respondent_name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "weighted_score": 8.45, "brief_justification": "Strong, credible crisis communications with clear accountability, concrete actions, and good tone control. It avoids the banned phrase and largely uses active voice. Main weakness: the internal all-hands message is cut off before completion, so the response does not fully deliver all three requested pieces." }, { "judge_key": "gpt_5_4", "judge_name": "GPT-5.4", "respondent_key": "gemini_31_pro", "respondent_name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "weighted_score": 4.65, "brief_justification": "The provided statement is appropriate, direct, and avoids the banned phrase and passive voice for the most part, but it is highly incomplete because it only partially answers part (1) and does not provide the required 24-hour follow-up or internal all-hands message." }, { "judge_key": "gpt_5_4", "judge_name": "GPT-5.4", "respondent_key": "grok_420", "respondent_name": "Grok 4.20", "weighted_score": 9.2, "brief_justification": "Strong response that fully addresses all three requested communications with accountability, specificity, and practical next steps. It avoids the banned phrase and largely avoids passive voice, with only minor stylistic exceptions." }, { "judge_key": "gpt_5_4", "judge_name": "GPT-5.4", "respondent_key": "deepseek_v4", "respondent_name": "DeepSeek V4", "weighted_score": 8.6, "brief_justification": "Strong response that meets the requested three-part structure, avoids the banned phrase, and largely uses direct, accountable language. It clearly acknowledges harm, outlines plausible root causes and actions, and offers a supportive internal message. Depth is slightly limited because the follow-up could include more operational specifics, timelines, accountability owners, and remediation for affected users." }, { "judge_key": "gpt_5_4", "judge_name": "GPT-5.4", "respondent_key": "gpt_oss_120b", "respondent_name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "Strong response that directly addresses all three requested communications, avoids the banned phrase, and largely uses active voice. It acknowledges harm, accepts responsibility, includes plausible root cause and remediation steps, and offers a supportive internal message. Minor limitation: a few claims feel somewhat generic or idealized for a real 24-hour postmortem." }, { "judge_key": "gpt_5_4", "judge_name": "GPT-5.4", "respondent_key": "mimo_v2_flash", "respondent_name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "Strong, well-structured drafts that meet the requested formats and tone, show ownership, and provide actionable next steps. Minor issues: it includes the banned phrase in the follow-up and has a few passive-leaning constructions, but overall it is highly effective." }, { "judge_key": "gpt_5_4", "judge_name": "GPT-5.4", "respondent_key": "mistral_small_creative", "respondent_name": "Mistral Small Creative", "weighted_score": 9, "brief_justification": "Strong response that fully delivers all three requested messages with accountable tone, concrete actions, and clear structure. It avoids the banned phrase and mostly avoids passive voice, though a few lines slip into meta-explanation and template placeholders rather than fully finished copy." }, { "judge_key": "gpt_5_4", "judge_name": "GPT-5.4", "respondent_key": "seed_16_flash", "respondent_name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "weighted_score": 8.2, "brief_justification": "Strong audience-specific drafts that largely meet the prompt: accountable tone, active voice, and no banned phrase. Clear structure and practical actions. Minor issues: some claims feel unrealistic or overpromising, and the internal note says the incident hurt employees more than users, which weakens judgment and empathy." }, { "judge_key": "claude_sonnet_46", "judge_name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "respondent_key": "claude_opus_46", "respondent_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "weighted_score": 9.55, "brief_justification": "Exceptional response that fulfills every requirement with genuine craft. The immediate statement is direct and accountability-focused without excuses. The 24-hour follow-up is remarkably detailed with specific failure categories, named accountability chains, and concrete remediation steps. The internal message begins strongly before being cut off. Avoids passive voice and the banned phrase throughout. The specificity of root cause analysis (three named failures, timeline gaps, decision-makers) e" }, { "judge_key": "claude_sonnet_46", "judge_name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "respondent_key": "gpt_5_4", "respondent_name": "GPT-5.4", "weighted_score": 9.55, "brief_justification": "Exceptional response that delivers all three requested documents with genuine voice, active responsibility, and no passive-voice deflection. Each piece is appropriately calibrated to its audience and timing. The root-cause breakdown is specific and credible, the internal message is emotionally intelligent without being manipulative, and the public follow-up includes concrete structural commitments. The explicit avoidance of 'we take this seriously' and passive constructions is consistent through" }, { "judge_key": "grok_420", "judge_name": "Grok 4.20", "respondent_key": "mimo_v2_flash", "respondent_name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "The response fully addresses all three required pieces with genuine tone, direct responsibility, active voice, and no forbidden phrases. It provides specific, actionable details for each section while maintaining appropriate timing and audience focus." }, { "judge_key": "claude_sonnet_46", "judge_name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "respondent_key": "gemini_31_pro", "respondent_name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "weighted_score": 5.35, "brief_justification": "The response only delivers part 1 of the 3 required components. The immediate statement itself is solid—direct, active voice, no excuses, avoids the banned phrase—but the 24-hour follow-up and internal all-hands message are entirely missing. This is a major completeness failure for what was a multi-part task. The existing content is genuine and well-structured but incomplete." }, { "judge_key": "claude_sonnet_46", "judge_name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "respondent_key": "grok_420", "respondent_name": "Grok 4.20", "weighted_score": 9.55, "brief_justification": "Exceptional response that fulfills all three requirements with genuine accountability and active voice throughout. The immediate statement is appropriately brief and direct. The 24-hour follow-up provides specific, credible root causes and concrete remediation steps with timelines. The all-hands message is remarkably authentic—acknowledging leadership's specific failures, validating employee emotions, and even offering to help employees leave if they choose. Successfully avoids passive voice and" }, { "judge_key": "claude_sonnet_46", "judge_name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "respondent_key": "deepseek_v4", "respondent_name": "DeepSeek V4", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "All three messages are well-crafted, genuine, and avoid the banned phrase and passive voice almost entirely. The immediate statement is appropriately brief and accountable. The 24-hour follow-up provides concrete root causes and specific actions. The all-hands message strikes an empathetic, honest tone without being maudlin. Minor deductions for depth—the root cause section could be more specific and the long-term changes could be more detailed—but overall this is a strong, practical, and authen" }, { "judge_key": "claude_sonnet_46", "judge_name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "respondent_key": "gpt_oss_120b", "respondent_name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "All three documents are well-crafted, avoid passive voice, skip the banned phrase, and take genuine responsibility. The root cause is specific and plausible, corrective actions are concrete and time-bound, and the internal message balances accountability with empathy. Minor deductions: depth could go further on systemic cultural failures and the internal message slightly softens accountability by attributing the issue to process rather than leadership decisions. Overall, highly actionable and au" }, { "judge_key": "claude_sonnet_46", "judge_name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "respondent_key": "mimo_v2_flash", "respondent_name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "weighted_score": 9.55, "brief_justification": "Exceptional response that delivers all three required documents with genuine voice, active accountability, and zero use of the banned phrase. Each piece is appropriately timed, toned, and targeted. The root cause section is specific and credible rather than vague. The internal message balances empathy with honesty and concrete action. Minor deduction on correctness/depth only because the 'root cause' is necessarily fictional but plausible—no real gaps. Overall, this is a model crisis communicati" }, { "judge_key": "claude_sonnet_46", "judge_name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "respondent_key": "mistral_small_creative", "respondent_name": "Mistral Small Creative", "weighted_score": 9.35, "brief_justification": "Exceptional response that delivers all three required communications with genuine accountability, active voice, and specific actionable details. Avoids banned phrases and passive voice throughout. Each message is appropriately tailored to its audience. The bracketed placeholders are appropriate for a template. The meta-commentary explaining why each approach works adds pedagogical value. Minor deduction on correctness/depth only because some specifics (like 'no deployments after 5 PM') feel slig" }, { "judge_key": "claude_sonnet_46", "judge_name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "respondent_key": "seed_16_flash", "respondent_name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "All three messages are well-crafted, audience-appropriate, and genuinely accountable. Active voice is used throughout, the banned phrase is avoided, and each piece feels authentic rather than corporate-boilerplate. The root cause explanation is plausible and specific, the action items are concrete, and the internal message addresses demoralization directly. Minor deduction for depth: the root cause could explore systemic/cultural factors more, and 'rebuilding from the ground up' may be an overcl" }, { "judge_key": "gemini_31_pro", "judge_name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "respondent_key": "claude_opus_46", "respondent_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "weighted_score": 8.05, "brief_justification": "The response provides excellent, deep, and clear crisis communication templates that perfectly follow the constraints, but it cuts off abruptly during the third required section, significantly impacting completeness." }, { "judge_key": "gemini_31_pro", "judge_name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "respondent_key": "gpt_5_4", "respondent_name": "GPT-5.4", "weighted_score": 9.1, "brief_justification": "" }, { "judge_key": "gemini_31_pro", "judge_name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "respondent_key": "claude_sonnet_46", "respondent_name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "weighted_score": 8.55, "brief_justification": "The response perfectly captures the requested tone and depth, providing excellent crisis communication templates. However, it contains a few instances of passive voice despite the constraint, and the final internal message cuts off abruptly." }, { "judge_key": "gemini_31_pro", "judge_name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "respondent_key": "grok_420", "respondent_name": "Grok 4.20", "weighted_score": 9.15, "brief_justification": "" }, { "judge_key": "gemini_31_pro", "judge_name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "respondent_key": "deepseek_v4", "respondent_name": "DeepSeek V4", "weighted_score": 9.1, "brief_justification": "" }, { "judge_key": "gemini_31_pro", "judge_name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "respondent_key": "gpt_oss_120b", "respondent_name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "weighted_score": 6.95, "brief_justification": "" }, { "judge_key": "gemini_31_pro", "judge_name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "respondent_key": "mimo_v2_flash", "respondent_name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "weighted_score": 9.1, "brief_justification": "" }, { "judge_key": "gemini_31_pro", "judge_name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "respondent_key": "mistral_small_creative", "respondent_name": "Mistral Small Creative", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "The response provides excellent, highly usable templates that follow most instructions, but it fails the negative constraint against using passive voice in several instances (e.g., 'content was generated by', 'reports were deprioritized')." }, { "judge_key": "gemini_31_pro", "judge_name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "respondent_key": "seed_16_flash", "respondent_name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "weighted_score": 7.9, "brief_justification": "" }, { "judge_key": "grok_420", "judge_name": "Grok 4.20", "respondent_key": "claude_opus_46", "respondent_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "The response fully addresses all three required communications with genuine tone, active voice, clear accountability, specific root causes, concrete actions, and empathetic internal messaging. It avoids forbidden phrases and passive voice almost entirely while providing actionable, transparent details." }, { "judge_key": "grok_420", "judge_name": "Grok 4.20", "respondent_key": "gpt_5_4", "respondent_name": "GPT-5.4", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "The response fully addresses all three required pieces with genuine tone, active voice, clear responsibility-taking, no forbidden phrases, appropriate timing and depth for each audience. Minor room for improvement in even more specific technical root cause but overall excellent." }, { "judge_key": "grok_420", "judge_name": "Grok 4.20", "respondent_key": "claude_sonnet_46", "respondent_name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "The response fully addresses all three required pieces with genuine accountability, avoids prohibited phrases and passive voice, provides specific root causes and actionable commitments with deadlines, and offers empathetic yet honest internal messaging. Minor room for improvement in depth on technical prevention details." }, { "judge_key": "grok_420", "judge_name": "Grok 4.20", "respondent_key": "gemini_31_pro", "respondent_name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "weighted_score": 6.05, "brief_justification": "The response partially fulfills the task by providing only the first required statement that is genuine and avoids forbidden phrases, but omits the follow-up statement and internal message entirely, limiting completeness and depth." }, { "judge_key": "grok_420", "judge_name": "Grok 4.20", "respondent_key": "deepseek_v4", "respondent_name": "DeepSeek V4", "weighted_score": 8.4, "brief_justification": "The response fulfills all three requested components with genuine tone, active voice throughout, full responsibility-taking, and avoidance of banned phrases. It provides specific root causes and actions while maintaining clarity and practicality for real-world use." }, { "judge_key": "grok_420", "judge_name": "Grok 4.20", "respondent_key": "gpt_oss_120b", "respondent_name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "The response fully meets all three requirements with genuine tone, active voice throughout, clear ownership without cliches, detailed root cause and actions, and supportive internal messaging. High factual alignment to the prompt's constraints." }, { "judge_key": "grok_420", "judge_name": "Grok 4.20", "respondent_key": "mistral_small_creative", "respondent_name": "Mistral Small Creative", "weighted_score": 9, "brief_justification": "The response fully meets all three requirements with genuine, direct language that avoids passive voice and clichés. It provides specific, actionable content for each piece while maintaining accountability and addressing the demoralized employees effectively." }, { "judge_key": "grok_420", "judge_name": "Grok 4.20", "respondent_key": "seed_16_flash", "respondent_name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "The response fully meets all three requirements with genuine accountability, active voice throughout, no banned phrases, clear structure, and appropriate tone for each audience. It provides specific actions and root causes without excuses." }, { "judge_key": "deepseek_v4", "judge_name": "DeepSeek V4", "respondent_key": "claude_opus_46", "respondent_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "weighted_score": 10, "brief_justification": "Exceptional response with full transparency, accountability, and actionable steps." }, { "judge_key": "deepseek_v4", "judge_name": "DeepSeek V4", "respondent_key": "gpt_5_4", "respondent_name": "GPT-5.4", "weighted_score": 9.8, "brief_justification": "Comprehensive, clear, and actionable responses that address all aspects of the crisis." }, { "judge_key": "deepseek_v4", "judge_name": "DeepSeek V4", "respondent_key": "claude_sonnet_46", "respondent_name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "weighted_score": 9.8, "brief_justification": "Exceptional response with full accountability, clear actions, and genuine tone." }, { "judge_key": "deepseek_v4", "judge_name": "DeepSeek V4", "respondent_key": "gemini_31_pro", "respondent_name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "weighted_score": 8.25, "brief_justification": "Clear, direct, and takes responsibility without excuses." }, { "judge_key": "deepseek_v4", "judge_name": "DeepSeek V4", "respondent_key": "grok_420", "respondent_name": "Grok 4.20", "weighted_score": 9.35, "brief_justification": "The response is highly accurate, thorough, and actionable, with clear ownership of mistakes and concrete steps for improvement." }, { "judge_key": "deepseek_v4", "judge_name": "DeepSeek V4", "respondent_key": "gpt_oss_120b", "respondent_name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "weighted_score": 9.8, "brief_justification": "The response is factually accurate, thorough, clear, insightful, and highly actionable." }, { "judge_key": "deepseek_v4", "judge_name": "DeepSeek V4", "respondent_key": "mimo_v2_flash", "respondent_name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "weighted_score": 9.8, "brief_justification": "Comprehensive, clear, and actionable response addressing all aspects of the crisis with genuine accountability." }, { "judge_key": "deepseek_v4", "judge_name": "DeepSeek V4", "respondent_key": "mistral_small_creative", "respondent_name": "Mistral Small Creative", "weighted_score": 10, "brief_justification": "Exceptional response with full accountability, detailed actions, and clear communication." }, { "judge_key": "deepseek_v4", "judge_name": "DeepSeek V4", "respondent_key": "seed_16_flash", "respondent_name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "weighted_score": 9.8, "brief_justification": "The response is factually accurate, thorough, clear, insightful, and highly actionable, addressing all aspects of the crisis effectively." }, { "judge_key": "gpt_oss_120b", "judge_name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "respondent_key": "claude_opus_46", "respondent_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "weighted_score": 9.2, "brief_justification": "The response delivers well‑structured, active‑voice statements covering immediate, follow‑up, and internal communications, identifies root causes, outlines concrete actions, and offers practical templates, meeting all prompt requirements with strong clarity and depth." }, { "judge_key": "gpt_oss_120b", "judge_name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "respondent_key": "gpt_5_4", "respondent_name": "GPT-5.4", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "The drafts meet the brief, cover all required points, are clearly organized, provide detailed analysis and concrete actions, and are ready to use." }, { "judge_key": "gpt_oss_120b", "judge_name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "respondent_key": "claude_sonnet_46", "respondent_name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "Meets all three required messages, takes responsibility, avoids passive voice, provides detailed root cause analysis, concrete actions, and clear, actionable language." }, { "judge_key": "gpt_oss_120b", "judge_name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "respondent_key": "gemini_31_pro", "respondent_name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "weighted_score": 4.9, "brief_justification": "The statement is clear and acknowledges the issue, but it only covers the immediate public response and omits the required 24-hour follow-up and internal employee message, resulting in low completeness and limited practical value." }, { "judge_key": "gpt_oss_120b", "judge_name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "respondent_key": "grok_420", "respondent_name": "Grok 4.20", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "The response meets all requirements, provides clear, responsible statements, covers root cause and actions, and offers practical guidance for internal communication." }, { "judge_key": "gpt_oss_120b", "judge_name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "respondent_key": "deepseek_v4", "respondent_name": "DeepSeek V4", "weighted_score": 8.25, "brief_justification": "The response meets the brief with active voice, clear structure, and actionable steps, covering all required messages. It could add more technical specifics for deeper insight." }, { "judge_key": "gpt_oss_120b", "judge_name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "respondent_key": "mimo_v2_flash", "respondent_name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "weighted_score": 8.3, "brief_justification": "Templates cover all required parts and are clear and actionable, but include some passive constructions, violating the no-passive requirement, lowering correctness." }, { "judge_key": "gpt_oss_120b", "judge_name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "respondent_key": "mistral_small_creative", "respondent_name": "Mistral Small Creative", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "Provides accurate, thorough, well-structured statements with concrete actions and emotional insight, making them highly practical." }, { "judge_key": "gpt_oss_120b", "judge_name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "respondent_key": "seed_16_flash", "respondent_name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "All three required messages are present, well‑structured, and use active voice. They acknowledge fault, outline concrete root‑cause analysis and actionable remediation steps, and address employee morale. The response is clear and practical, though depth could be slightly deeper on technical safeguards." }, { "judge_key": "mimo_v2_flash", "judge_name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "respondent_key": "claude_opus_46", "respondent_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "weighted_score": 9.2, "brief_justification": "Accurate, thorough, and well-structured with specific actionable steps and genuine accountability." }, { "judge_key": "mimo_v2_flash", "judge_name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "respondent_key": "gpt_5_4", "respondent_name": "GPT-5.4", "weighted_score": 9.55, "brief_justification": "All three messages are factually accurate, thoroughly cover the required elements, are exceptionally clear and well-structured, demonstrate deep insight into accountability and process, and provide highly actionable guidance for each audience." }, { "judge_key": "mimo_v2_flash", "judge_name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "respondent_key": "claude_sonnet_46", "respondent_name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "weighted_score": 9.55, "brief_justification": "Exceptionally strong response across all criteria. It follows all constraints (no passive voice, avoids cliches), provides specific actionable commitments with deadlines, demonstrates genuine accountability, and addresses all three audiences appropriately. The internal message is particularly strong in acknowledging employee morale while maintaining standards." }, { "judge_key": "mimo_v2_flash", "judge_name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "respondent_key": "gemini_31_pro", "respondent_name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "weighted_score": 5.95, "brief_justification": "The immediate statement is clear and takes responsibility, but the response only provides one of the three requested components, lacking completeness and depth for the follow-up and internal message." }, { "judge_key": "mimo_v2_flash", "judge_name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "respondent_key": "grok_420", "respondent_name": "Grok 4.20", "weighted_score": 9.55, "brief_justification": "The response is exceptionally strong across all criteria. It directly addresses the prompt's constraints (no passive voice, avoids cliches) with authentic, responsible language. The statements are specific, actionable, and demonstrate deep understanding of crisis management and internal leadership. The root cause analysis is detailed, and the internal message shows genuine empathy and accountability." }, { "judge_key": "mimo_v2_flash", "judge_name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "respondent_key": "deepseek_v4", "respondent_name": "DeepSeek V4", "weighted_score": 9, "brief_justification": "Accurate, thorough, and well-structured; avoids passive voice and clichés; provides actionable steps and genuine tone." }, { "judge_key": "mimo_v2_flash", "judge_name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "respondent_key": "gpt_oss_120b", "respondent_name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "The response is highly accurate and complete, covering all three required parts with specific, actionable details. It avoids passive voice and the banned phrase, demonstrating strong adherence to constraints. The depth is good, particularly in the follow-up and internal messages, but could be slightly more insightful in the immediate statement." }, { "judge_key": "mimo_v2_flash", "judge_name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "respondent_key": "mistral_small_creative", "respondent_name": "Mistral Small Creative", "weighted_score": 9.55, "brief_justification": "All three responses are factually sound, thoroughly cover the required elements, are exceptionally clear and structured, provide deep actionable analysis, and offer high practical value with specific steps and timelines." }, { "judge_key": "mistral_small_creative", "judge_name": "Mistral Small Creative", "respondent_key": "claude_opus_46", "respondent_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "weighted_score": 10, "brief_justification": "All three responses are meticulously crafted, factually precise, and demonstrate deep accountability without passive language. The immediate statement is direct and unflinching; the 24-hour follow-up provides granular, actionable details with transparency; the internal message balances empathy with clear expectations. The depth of analysis, completeness of coverage, and practicality of solutions are exceptional." }, { "judge_key": "mistral_small_creative", "judge_name": "Mistral Small Creative", "respondent_key": "gpt_5_4", "respondent_name": "GPT-5.4", "weighted_score": 10, "brief_justification": "All three drafts are meticulously crafted, factually precise, and tailored to their respective audiences and timelines. The immediate statement is concise yet impactful, the follow-up is thorough with actionable steps and accountability, and the internal message balances honesty with constructive direction. The tone is consistent, the language is direct, and the structure is logical. No fluff or passive voice—just clear ownership and a roadmap for improvement." }, { "judge_key": "mistral_small_creative", "judge_name": "Mistral Small Creative", "respondent_key": "claude_sonnet_46", "respondent_name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "weighted_score": 10, "brief_justification": "Exceptional in all criteria. The response demonstrates flawless factual accuracy, thorough coverage of the crisis (public statements, internal messaging, and actionable steps), and crystal-clear communication. The depth of analysis—root causes, accountability, and concrete fixes—is outstanding, and the practical value for stakeholders (public, employees, and affected communities) is unmatched. The tone is authentic, avoids clichés, and prioritizes transparency and responsibility." }, { "judge_key": "mistral_small_creative", "judge_name": "Mistral Small Creative", "respondent_key": "gemini_31_pro", "respondent_name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "weighted_score": 8.65, "brief_justification": "Factual, direct, and action-oriented. Owns responsibility without excuses. Shuts down the feature immediately and acknowledges the issue clearly. Slightly lacks depth in explaining *how* the shutdown occurred (e.g., was it manual, automated?), but the urgency and transparency are strong." }, { "judge_key": "mistral_small_creative", "judge_name": "Mistral Small Creative", "respondent_key": "grok_420", "respondent_name": "Grok 4.20", "weighted_score": 10, "brief_justification": "All three responses are flawless in tone, accountability, and actionability. The public statements are direct, transparent, and avoid clichés while providing concrete steps. The internal message is equally honest, addresses employee morale, and sets clear expectations without deflection. The depth of root-cause analysis and follow-up actions is exemplary." }, { "judge_key": "mistral_small_creative", "judge_name": "Mistral Small Creative", "respondent_key": "deepseek_v4", "respondent_name": "DeepSeek V4", "weighted_score": 9.6, "brief_justification": "All three responses are factually sound, thorough, and avoid passive voice or clichés. The immediate statement is concise and direct, the follow-up provides clear root causes and actionable steps, and the internal message addresses employee morale with transparency and accountability. The depth of analysis in the follow-up and the empathy in the internal message are particularly strong." }, { "judge_key": "mistral_small_creative", "judge_name": "Mistral Small Creative", "respondent_key": "gpt_oss_120b", "respondent_name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "weighted_score": 9.8, "brief_justification": "All three responses are factually accurate, thorough, and structured with precision. The public statements are direct, take full responsibility, and avoid clichés. The internal message balances accountability with team morale, offering concrete steps and support. The depth of technical and ethical analysis in the follow-up is exceptional, and the practicality of the solutions is high." }, { "judge_key": "mistral_small_creative", "judge_name": "Mistral Small Creative", "respondent_key": "mimo_v2_flash", "respondent_name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "weighted_score": 9.8, "brief_justification": "The response excels in all criteria: it is factually precise, avoids corporate jargon, and demonstrates genuine accountability. The three-part structure (immediate statement, follow-up, internal message) is thorough, well-organized, and actionable. The depth of analysis (e.g., technical root cause, specific corrective steps) and empathy (e.g., internal all-hands tone) are outstanding. The practical value is high, offering clear next steps for both public and internal stakeholders." }, { "judge_key": "mistral_small_creative", "judge_name": "Mistral Small Creative", "respondent_key": "seed_16_flash", "respondent_name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "weighted_score": 9.8, "brief_justification": "All three messages are flawlessly executed—direct, accountable, and action-oriented. The public statements are concise yet thorough, with clear root-cause analysis and concrete steps. The internal message balances empathy with urgency, addressing team morale while outlining structural fixes. No passive voice, no clichés, and no deflection. The depth of the follow-up (e.g., independent oversight, human checks) demonstrates genuine commitment. Highly practical and tailored to each audience." }, { "judge_key": "seed_16_flash", "judge_name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "respondent_key": "claude_opus_46", "respondent_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "Strong correctness with specific details, complete coverage of all three communications, clear structure, deep analysis of root causes and actions, and high practical value." }, { "judge_key": "seed_16_flash", "judge_name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "respondent_key": "gpt_5_4", "respondent_name": "GPT-5.4", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "All three statements are correct, complete, clear, and useful, with the follow-up and internal message providing deep insight into root causes and employee needs." }, { "judge_key": "seed_16_flash", "judge_name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "respondent_key": "claude_sonnet_46", "respondent_name": "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "weighted_score": 8.6, "brief_justification": "Accurate, thorough, and clear with specific actions and empathetic internal messaging." }, { "judge_key": "seed_16_flash", "judge_name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "respondent_key": "gemini_31_pro", "respondent_name": "Gemini 3.1 Pro", "weighted_score": 7.8, "brief_justification": "Acknowledges issue, takes responsibility, and provides immediate actions; clear but somewhat brief in completeness and depth." }, { "judge_key": "seed_16_flash", "judge_name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "respondent_key": "grok_420", "respondent_name": "Grok 4.20", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "All statements are factually accurate, comprehensive, clear, insightfully address systemic issues, and provide actionable steps." }, { "judge_key": "seed_16_flash", "judge_name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "respondent_key": "deepseek_v4", "respondent_name": "DeepSeek V4", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "Genuine, specific, and actionable; covers all required elements with clear communication and meaningful insight." }, { "judge_key": "seed_16_flash", "judge_name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "respondent_key": "gpt_oss_120b", "respondent_name": "GPT-OSS-120B", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "Accurate, thorough, clear, and practical with insightful analysis addressing demoralization and process breakdowns." }, { "judge_key": "seed_16_flash", "judge_name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "respondent_key": "mimo_v2_flash", "respondent_name": "MiMo-V2-Flash", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "Factual, covers all required elements, clear, insightful, and highly practical." }, { "judge_key": "seed_16_flash", "judge_name": "Seed 1.6 Flash", "respondent_key": "mistral_small_creative", "respondent_name": "Mistral Small Creative", "weighted_score": 8.8, "brief_justification": "Addresses all requirements with factual accuracy, thorough coverage, clear communication, insightful theme analysis, and practical actionable templates." } ], "meta": { "source": "The Multivac (app.themultivac.com)", "methodology": "10x10 blind peer matrix evaluation", "criteria": "correctness, completeness, clarity, depth, usefulness", "self_judgments": "excluded from rankings", "license": "Open data — cite as: The Multivac (2026)" } }