# The Multivac — Evaluation Report

**Evaluation ID:** EVAL-20260403-100657
**Date:** Mar 12, 2026
**Category:** analysis
**Question ID:** ANALYSIS-009

---

## Question

You're analyzing a startup's pitch deck claim: "We have no direct competitors."

The startup is building: "AI-powered meeting summarization for enterprise teams"

Their competitive slide shows:
- Otter.ai - "Consumer focused"
- Fireflies.ai - "No enterprise features"
- Microsoft Teams - "Generic, not AI-native"
- Zoom IQ - "Locked to Zoom ecosystem"

Perform a rigorous competitive analysis:
1. Are their dismissals of competitors valid?
2. What competitors might they be missing?
3. What's the real competitive landscape?
4. What would you tell a potential investor?

---

## Winner

**Claude Sonnet 4.6** (openrouter)
- Winner Score: 9.37
- Matrix Average: 9.07
- Total Judgments: 89

---

## Rankings

| Rank | Model | Provider | Avg Score | Judgments |
|------|-------|----------|-----------|----------|
| 1 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | openrouter | 9.37 | 8 |
| 2 | Grok 4.20 | openrouter | 9.31 | 9 |
| 3 | GPT-5.4 | openrouter | 9.29 | 9 |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.6 | openrouter | 9.28 | 9 |
| 5 | MiniMax M2.5 | openrouter | 9.16 | 9 |
| 6 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Google | 9.08 | 9 |
| 7 | DeepSeek V4 | openrouter | 8.93 | 9 |
| 8 | MiMo-V2-Flash | Xiaomi | 8.85 | 9 |
| 9 | Gemini 3.1 Pro | openrouter | 8.83 | 9 |
| 10 | GPT-OSS-120B | OpenAI | 8.64 | 9 |

---

## 10×10 Judgment Matrix

Rows = Judge, Columns = Respondent. Self-judgments excluded (—).

| Judge ↓ / Resp → | MiMo-V2-Flash | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Claude Opus | GPT-5.4 | DeepSeek V4 | Claude Sonnet | Grok 4.20 | GPT-OSS-120B | Gemini 3 | MiniMax M2.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiMo-V2-Flash | — | 9.3 | 9.3 | 9.6 | 8.8 | · | 9.0 | 9.3 | 9.3 | 9.0 |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | 8.6 | — | 10.0 | 9.3 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 10.0 | 9.8 |
| Claude Opus | 8.8 | 9.2 | — | 9.2 | 9.2 | 9.8 | 9.6 | 8.8 | 9.3 | 9.3 |
| GPT-5.4 | 8.3 | 7.7 | 9.0 | — | 8.6 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| DeepSeek V4 | 9.0 | 9.4 | 8.8 | 9.2 | — | 9.8 | 9.4 | 9.8 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Claude Sonnet | 9.3 | 9.0 | 9.8 | 9.6 | 8.8 | — | 9.3 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 8.8 | 8.8 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 8.8 | 9.0 | — | 8.8 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| GPT-OSS-120B | 8.2 | 7.9 | 8.4 | 8.7 | 8.3 | 8.7 | 8.7 | — | 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Gemini 3 | 9.6 | 9.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 9.6 | 10.0 | 9.8 | 9.2 | — | 9.6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 9.0 | 8.6 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 8.6 | 8.8 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 8.8 | — |

---

## Methodology

- **10×10 Blind Peer Matrix:** All models answer the same question, then all models judge all responses.
- **5 Criteria:** Correctness, completeness, clarity, depth, usefulness (each scored 1–10).
- **Self-judgments excluded:** Models do not judge their own responses.
- **Weighted Score:** Composite of all 5 criteria.

---

## Citation

The Multivac (2026). Blind Peer Evaluation: ANALYSIS-009. app.themultivac.com

## License

Open data. Free to use, share, and build upon. Please cite The Multivac when using this data.

Download raw JSON: https://app.themultivac.com/api/evaluations/EVAL-20260403-100657/results
Full dataset: https://app.themultivac.com/dashboard/export