← Evaluations/EVAL-20260402-212207
analysis
Apr 02, 2026ANALYSIS-028

Critique this academic paper abstract: 'We fine-tuned GPT-4 on 1,000 medical cases and achieved 97% accuracy on diagnosis prediction, outperforming board-certified physicians (89%). Our model can replace doctors in primary care settings. We release our model for immediate clinical use.' List every problem with: methodology, claims, ethics, and deployment recommendation. What would a responsible version of this research look like?

Winner
Claude Opus 4.6
openrouter
9.60
WINNER SCORE
matrix avg: 9.13
results.json report.mdFull dataset (CSV) →
10×10 Judgment Matrix · 89 judgments
OPEN DATA
Judge ↓ / Respondent →Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Opus 4.6GPT-5.4DeepSeek V4MiMo-V2-FlashClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-OSS-120BGrok 4.20Gemini 3MiniMax M2.5
Gemini 3.1 Pro10.07.79.89.69.38.610.010.010.0
Claude Opus 4.69.09.49.09.39.39.610.09.39.3
GPT-5.48.19.88.17.58.07.59.08.37.8
DeepSeek V48.89.79.79.49.7·9.49.49.0
MiMo-V2-Flash9.29.29.09.29.69.89.39.89.6
Claude Sonnet 4.69.010.09.48.88.89.89.68.88.8
GPT-OSS-120B7.99.08.48.48.48.88.48.68.3
Grok 4.209.29.29.28.88.89.09.08.88.8
Gemini 39.610.010.09.810.010.010.010.09.8
MiniMax M2.58.89.69.28.88.39.28.89.28.6